Occupy Vancouver is About Benefits, Not Risks

by #OccupyVancouver Official Media Releases on Tuesday, November 15, 2011 at 12:09pm 

Occupy Vancouver, Unceded Coast Salish Territory, November 11, 2011 – Vancouver Fire Chief John McKearney said after a site inspection Thursday that Occupy Vancouver is close to conforming to Wednesday’s court directive to improve fire safety. VFRS officials visited the site again Friday afternoon to order certain tents to be moved six feet away from the art gallery building and to ensure tarps do not span multiple single-person tents.

Every day, Occupiers can be seen working hard to address what they feel is an ever-expanding list of orders and directives. The initial order included only five basic requirements; however, the court order allows the Fire Chief to add to the list at any time – an opportunity Occupy Vancouver says the Vancouver Fire Department has made a point of capitalizing on.

“Some of us have been trying to comply the Fire Chief’s new requirements, but we have not been able to find out what they are”, said Tom, an Occupier with the media committee. “None of the onsite Firefighters seem to know what those requirements are, and we’ve received no exhaustive official list from the fire department. Their lack of communication with us has seriously impeded our efforts. It’s no better than the claims they make about us not being communicative enough.”

Despite their confusion, Occupiers are continuing to respond to the new and changing demands, and are constructing new dome structures which they believe will surpass even the most stringent of fire safety standards.

“The domes we are constructing are far safer than single-person tents in that they maximize heat transfer between multiple occupants. Each dome will be covered with a flame-retardant tarp, and will have smoke detectors and fire extinguishers mounted on the inside,” said Eric Hamilton-Smith, a protester and member of the logistics committee. “In addition, the domes allow for a community-dwelling model which speaks to the nature of what we have created here,” said Hamilton-Smith.

“At Occupy Vancouver, what we’ve built is a real community that produces a plethora of social benefits and public goods, such as education, skills development, and political engagement.”

Hamilton-Smith, who is completing his master’s thesis in public policy at Simon Fraser, is working with a team of researchers to evaluate the benefits Occupy Vancouver provides society. “If you look at the half-million the City wasted on October 15th due to riot-related paranoia, the benefits we’ve provided the city far exceed that figure.”

Although the team has only just begun its research, initial projections of those benefits already exceed a million dollars. The projection includes the benefits from housing, food, clothing, medical care, a loaning library, education and skills development, socialization for marginalized people, and political engagement. “Many of those benefits are easily quantifiable by finding market substitutes and comparing the costs of those with the services offered at Occupy,” said Hamilton-Smith.

###

If you would like more information or would like to schedule an interview, please contact:

Communications Work-Group,

Occupy Vancouver Media Committee,

[email protected]

Occupy Vancouver is a non-violent political movement to transform the unequal, unfair, and growing disparity in the distribution of power and wealth in Vancouver and around the globe.

Occupy Vancouver Community Services Preliminary Fact Sheet

Housing Services

Occupiers hold that the encampment is a necessary part of their political expression, the Occupy Vancouver site has become a community which approximately 80 people currently call home. Of those residents, approximately 25 would otherwise be defined as ‘street homeless’.  In Vancouver, the estimated cost per mat for emergency shelters is $83 per night. With an average of 25 street homeless

housed at VAG over the past month, the protest site has provided approximately $62,250 worth of housing services, and counting.

Food Services – Food, Not Bombs!

Volunteers with Food Not Bombs have been serving free vegan meals out of a tent every day since the occupation started. It has become a de facto soup kitchen, feeding people who are part of the occupation, but also many others who just want a good meal. According to Mission Possible, an organization that provides free daily meal services, the approximate cost of providing each meal (not including the organization’s operating costs) is approximately $1.50 per meal. Food Not Bombs serves an average of 1,000 meals per day at Occupy Vancouver over 30 days, totaling 30,000 meals, for an estimated $45,000.

Medical Services

Volunteer medics have been providing a range of services, from treating colds, cuts, and scrapes, to dealing with serious infections and reviving one man who suffered a drug overdose. Most of the clinic patients are from the community at large, many of whom may be homeless. Crossroads Clinics Vancouver charges approximately $180 per visit for non-MSP covered visits, and estimates the same cost to taxpayers when visits are covered by MSP. The Medic Tent at the VAG has an average of about 100 visits per day, totaling $540,000 of benefits. In addition, about a dozen visits involved having a patient stay in a clinic bed for supervision. The cost of a hospital bed at the ER is $500 per day, adding an additional $6,000 of avoided costs. In the 30 days since the Occupation began, the Medic Tent has resulted in an estimated total of $546,000 in avoided costs to BC’s healthcare system.

Skills Development

Occupy Vancouver has provided people with the opportunity to find fulfillment in the work they are engaged in and to develop new skills. This includes many people who have been unemployed or discouraged from looking for work due to the poor Canadian labour market. “The lack of employment prospects causes many people to become discouraged and lose hope. These people are in precarious situations and are at an increased risk of falling into depression, drug use, or alcoholism.”

Before the Occupation, Reo Bousquet, 28, was struggling to make ends meet struggling with unemployment and suffering from depression. Since his involvement with the Occupy movement, his spirits have lifted and he is known around the camp for his positive attitude, which boosts camp morale, and for his hard work ethic. Reo has been spending most his time working with the Media Committee, and has been developing new skill-sets such as online live-streaming and video production. “Occupy Vancouver means the world to me. Now I’m focused on providing a better future for my wife and son,” said Bousquet.

Support and Socialization for Marginalized People

Ricky Lavallie says that he prefers living at the encampment because he often encounters violence in shelters. “Staying in the shelters was rough. People in the shelters didn’t like me because I’m First Nations and I would get beat up all the time,” said Ricky. “It’s fun to be here with my new family. I’ve learned a lot and also shared the First Nations way with everyone here. People here are teaching me how to write in my diary, and to read.” Ricky says that no one had ever tried to teach him how to read or write before coming to Occupy Vancouver.

Political Engagement and Education

Around the world, the Occupy movement has engaged millions of people of all ages and walks of life. In Vancouver thousands of people have been repeatedly coming to the Art Gallery to volunteer, participate in the General Assembly, attend workshops, and listen to speakers.

By providing an opportunity for people to voice their concerns and act on issues that matter to them, Occupy Vancouver has politically re-energized a public that had grown too apathetic to vote. Through providing a collaborative venue for discussion and meaningful participation in politics, the movement has made a great many people feel empowered about participating in political discourse, and about having a say in the socio-economic issues that are important to them.

Permanent link to this article: http://www.genuinewitty.com/2011/11/15/occupy-vancouver-is-about-benefits-not-risks/

Something Good Occupy Vancouver stands for!

Beyond all of the silliness of the Tent Council, and people who like to dress-up like ninja’s, Occupy Vancouver has real meaning. It is a shame the above mentioned people have to destroy that…
Here’s a Media Release just out from OV, that I stand behind 110%!

———————————-
For Immediate Release
———————————-

MEDIA COMMUNICATION — Occupy Vancouver Issues Challenge to Municipal Elections Candidates Re: Campaign Contributions

Occupy Vancouver, Unceded Coast Salish Territory, November 14, 2011 –

Occupy Vancouver has send letters to all municipal candidates
challenging them to immediately reveal the sources and amounts of
all campaign donations greater than $100, including any money collected
outside the elections cycle by 11:59pm Thursday, November 17, or
face the music on Election Day.

Occupy Vancouver’s General Assembly condemns the influence of
corporate money on Vancouver’s elections and municipal
decision-making. “Corporations are effectively buying elections,” says
Eric Hamilton-Smith, a protester and organizer at Occupy Vancouver,
“As a result of this influence, elected officials tend to create
policies that benefit their financiers’ interests rather than the
interests of the people who elect them into office. This is
particularly problematic here in Vancouver, where big developers have
contributed to an affordable housing crisis.”

According to Tristan Markle, author for The Mainlander and Occupy
Vancouver organizer, “The big developers need prices to stay high in
order to ensure maximum profits. To protect these donors, the NPA and
Vision will go to great lengths to maintain the unaffordable status
quo.”

According to data from the Vancouver Sun, the lion’s share of campaign
contributions received by both the Non-Partisan Association (NPA) and
Vision Vancouver come from big developers. In 2008, approximately
two-thirds of campaign money raised by Vision Vancouver was from
corporations, including half a million from developers. The NPA also
raised half a million from developers that same year.

At the November 13th 2011 General Assembly, Occupiers agreed by
consensus to the following two proposals:

1. Removal of the influence of corporate contributions from municipal
elections so that citizens—not corporations—are put at the forefront
in municipal decision-making.

In order to achieve this, Occupiers suggest the following reforms:
• Establish limits on the amount of money candidates can spend while
campaigning
• Establish limits on the amount of money any one person can donate to
a candidate or political party
• Prohibit corporations and other entities from donating money to
election campaigns
• Prohibit donations from non-BC residents

2. Establishment of real transparency in municipal campaign finance by
requiring candidates and parties to reveal their donors and amounts
before, not long after an election is over as is current practice.

Occupy Vancouver is giving all candidates until 11:59pm Thursday,
November 17th to make their campaign contributions publicly available
online or be held to account by voters on Saturday.

###

If you would like more information or would like to schedule an
interview, please contact:

Communications Work-Group,
Occupy Vancouver Media Committee,
[email protected]

Occupy Vancouver is a non-violent political movement to transform the
unequal, unfair, and growing disparity in the distribution of power
and wealth in Vancouver and around the globe.

—————–END——————-

Permanent link to this article: http://www.genuinewitty.com/2011/11/15/something-good-occupy-vancouver-stands-for/

The Case of the 99% vs the 99%

One of the things that has astounded me about the Tent Council, among many, is their lack of cooperation with the Fire Department. Particularly, because most of them are working people, and most consider themselves to be members of the 99%.

Back in the first week, I heard the VFD talking amongst themselves in fear that the tents were a serious hazard. This is not something that anyone disagreed with- so, I suggested we contact the VFD and work together to build a fire plan. The idea was accepted and, at first, embraced by people living in the tents. We built fire lanes, adjusted the tarps, and made a safer place for them to live.

Each time the VFD come to do an inspection they find that changes from the day before had been once again reversed. At times, it looks like they are intentionally antagonizing the VFD- a case of the 99% vs. the 99%. The fire chief best explains in the quote below… (press for link to the original story)

“We’ve found that we’ve had to repeatedly say the same message over and over again to the point that we gave them detailed instructions a couple of days ago exactly what I’ve been instructing my all my staff to be stating and doing,”

The real question is, why are people doing such self-destructive behavior? Who is telling them this is a good idea, and why isn’t anyone trying to stop it?

Permanent link to this article: http://www.genuinewitty.com/2011/11/15/the-case-of-the-99-vs-the-99/

Hijacked! Occupy Vancouver 1.0 no longer belongs to the 99%…


One month ago today I was sitting at the same place writing Activists & Buggy Whips, a paper that came out of the frustration of how the many people organizing Occupy Vancouver had refused to use the word ‘denounce’ in reference to violence. I was confounded at the time, had no idea why this simple idea was such a struggle to get consensus on. Had I only known then what I know now…

This all began when someone posted a provocative video on the OV Facebook page on October 10th.  The video was of Harsha Walia, who was viciously defending the concept of ‘Diversity of Tactics’- an ambiguous mix of violent & non-violent methods of protest. D0T could include anything from holding a flash-mob dancing on the sidewalk, to smashing the windows of a bank. As a person who is 110% anti-violence (it never solves anything), I felt the imperative to get clarity on this issue.

So, as I mentioned in the linked  paper, I went through days of abuse and attacks as a result. It was ugly, people were telling me that I was a typical ‘white male’ and I should ‘check my privlege’ and shut-up. This went on for days- curiously, this is the same method of attack that Harsha used against the man she was debating against- and the audience actually clapped in her support!

Yes, you heard that correctly- she was defending violence, and used a man’s race & gender as a tool to squash his political opinion. A lot of you are probably realizing that this is not only wrong, but it is actually a crime to do so! Unbelievable she would take this tactic- but that’s the problem, DoT gives one carte blanche to do whatever it takes to get acceptance for one’s point-of-view. Rather unaceptable if you ask me…

The harassment continued until three days later- and my gender/race were used against me ad-nauseam.  This continued until I pointed-out it was illegal to use gender & race to discriminate against someone’s political opinion. Suddenly, the attacks ended. And, Harsha wrote a nice paper that softened her position. But, her paper was still somewhat ambiguous, saying:

” These gatherings have been explicitly nonviolent from the start and in hundreds of cities across the continent. Obviously this is the right tactic for this moment.”

By this point I was exhausted- the attacks had become so harsh, and so pointed towards me, that at one point they had sent me to tears. Having grown-up in a feminist-led household, I’m quite a sensitive guy, and it seriously hurt to be called a racist and sexist- it simply just isn’t who I am. So, I mistakenly accepted the ambiguity and decided to move on.

From there, I began to  introduce the idea that OV needed a code-of-conduct. Initially I recommended what we referred to as the Eight Rules– a precursor to what later became OWS8 in New York. This turned into another argument- this time, confirming the truth behind Godwin’s Law. The final argument was that had the Jews had not acted 100% non-violent, they would have perhaps not faced the Holocaust. This really was pushing things a bit too far…

Sunday, November 6th, was a tumultuous day for OV. The troubles began early in the afternoon when a number of people appeared wearing all-black, balaclavas, and some carrying large black flags (see the picture above). Curiously, it was this day that I first saw Harsha since the planning meeting…

Later that evening I watched the General Assembly over the Livestream- this was shortly after the incident with the #SacredProvocation.  It was bizarre- first, it was more efficient than any GA I’ve seen. They slammed-through a large number of amendments, including one to pay $300 per week for wood for the fire! And, I believe, they voted to give $50 p/day to the new First Nations people who joined us.  It was obvious to most that the movement had been hijacked!

The next day, I got into a conversation with one of the police officers who has been assigned to OV. I had got to know him due to an issue where an outsider was making threats to ‘de-occupy’ OV, and was identified trying to recruit others through Twitter. We spoke about the threat, and how it had seemed to disappear- then, the conversation turned to what happened that evening. He said that the VPD were aware that a “highly organised and potentially violent” group had hijacked OV. He said the police are watching them very carefully. I’d already suspected this, but the cop said this independently without my mentioning the problem.

I now have no doubt our concerns about being hijacked are true- but, the details of who and why are still foggy to most of us. But, it is not a big secret- the fact that the GA voted to pay for the #SacredProvocation says it all. The only thing worse than to start a fire would be to attack the police. And, the people in black costumes began doing that on that Sunday also- before they were asked to stop…

So, once I had confirmation from the police (from an officer who has told me straight-out he is a member of the 99%) , I took the next step and asked Harsha to confirm or deny if she had a connection to the ninjas.

I was told that she is a “good person” who works hard for the DTES, and doesn’t deserve to be questioned like this. But, all I asked was to confirm the ambiguity of her last statement- not a lot to ask really, considering she appeared on the same day as the people in costumes. Not much to ask because of her video, and not much to ask considering she was talking with a couple of them. But, was I ever wrong…

People who were friendly towards me told me to stop- that it was not allowable for me to ask her confirmation she is still against violence “at this moment”. I was publicly called insane, someone contacted a family member and repeated that message. It became obvious who was for and who was against my questions.

This issue was discussed on the Facebook page for about a day and a half. Then, just when it looked like she had no choice but to give an answer- zap, the thread had disappeared. Someone erased it.

Now, we are one month into the occupation, and we still don’t have a code-of-conduct, and the ethos behind our movement has been thrown to the side by a small group who seem hell-bent on ending the movement. There are a couple, faint, lights of hope- but, it looks likely that Occupy Vancouver 1.0 is just about over. We’ll see what happens in court tomorrow…

Permanent link to this article: http://www.genuinewitty.com/2011/11/14/occupy-1-0-is-hijacked/

Curtis Brick Fountain: So it never happens again… (or, does it?)

One of the First Nations participants of Occupy Vancouver came to me a couple weeks ago and asked a favor. He told me about the water fountain that was installed in Grandview park in memory of Curtis Brick- a First Nations man who died of dehydration on July 29th 2009.

It was the hottest day that summer, Mr. Brick was first noticed laying in the park at 9am and appeared to be sleeping. Then at 4pm, someone noticed he was “in obvious physical distress”. Emergency services were called, and were not friendly when they arrived, they yelled to wake him up, and forced an oxygen mask on his face causing him to bleed. Nearby where many people enjoying a day at the park, and nobody else bothered to check on him all day.

Vancouver was disgraced. I remember reading about this from Montreal- a truly horrible chapter in our city’s history.

On September 17, 2011, Mayor Gregor dedicated a water fountain in Mr Brick’s memory. I’ve been told his speech mentioned that the fountain was placed there “So this never happens again”. Sounds good, right?

Well, I went to the fountain a few days ago and was appauled to see that the fountain is not working! How can this be! According to the city, the fountain has been turned-off for the winter. Something just doesn’t seem right about this…

Then, a day later, I was walking down Robson Street and saw a unique kind of water fountain. The top had a fountain for people, and the bottom had a fountain for dogs. And, you’d never believe it- but, both of these fountains are working!

I’m not sure what the message is here- but, I must say, it seems a bit crazy that a fountain for dogs works while a fountain meant to stop homeless people from dehydrating doesn’t. I’m sure there is a technical excuse- that said, it seems rather disrespectful…

Permanent link to this article: http://www.genuinewitty.com/2011/11/14/curtis-brick-fountain-so-it-never-happens-again-or-does-it/

Load more